Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114219›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2017

Entanglement of UPR

Safikur Rahman, Arif Tasleem Jan, Archana Ayyagari, Jiwoo Kim, Jihoe Kim, Rinki Minakshi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deciphering the Link Between ERFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The onus of cannabinoids in interrupting the molecular odyssey of breast cancer: A critical perspective on UPRSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Reaction to Endoplasmic Reticulum StressFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Safikur RahmanDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Arif Tasleem JanDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Archana AyyagariDepartment of Microbiology, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Jiwoo KimDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Jihoe KimDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Rinki MinakshiInstitute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Yeungnam University · KRUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an indispensable cellular organelle that remains highly active in neuronal cells. The ER bears the load of maintaining protein homeostasis in the cellular network by managing the folding of incoming nascent peptides; however, the stress imposed by physiological/environmental factors can cause ER dysfunctions that lead to the activation of ER unfolded protein response (UPR

Indexed as

agingdementiaendoplasmic reticulum (ER)neurodegenerative diseasesUPR (unfolded protein response)

Identifiers

PMID29114219
PMCPMC5660724
OpenAlexW2766157496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.