ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
Clinical utility of anti-C1q antibody in primary and secondary vasculitic conditions.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection rate, demographic associations and clinical implications of anti-C1q antibody elevations across diverse disease states.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome presenting with bilateral scleritis.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- The Immunopathology of Complement Proteins and Innate Immunity in Autoimmune Disease.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAnti-C1q antibodies (Anti-C1q Ab) are seen in hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS), infection-associated vasculitis such as hepatitis C virus-related vasculitis and in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid vasculitis, polyarteritis nodosa, giant cell arteritis, vascular Behcet's disease, and cryoglobulin associated vasculitis. Aim of this study is to evaluate the presence of Anti-C1q Ab in vasculitis and to determine if any difference exists between primary and secondary vasculitis in relation to this antibody. PATIENTS AND
methodsConsecutive patients with diagnosis of either a primary or secondary vasculitis were recruited. Primary vasculitis were diagnosed by the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Clinical features and serological markers were noted. Anti-C1q Ab was assayed by commercially available ELISA kit (Demeditec Diagnostics GmbH, Germany).
resultsSixty-four patients were recruited for the study comprising of 41 primary vasculitis and 23 secondary vasculitis cases. No difference in Anti-C1q Ab levels between primary and secondary vasculitis was noted. Four patients were positive for Anti-C1q Ab out of the 64 patients. Of the four, one patient was diagnosed as HUVS, 2 patients as systemic lupus erythermatosus with vasculitis (16.7%) and another patient was diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis with vasculitis (14.28%). Anti-C1q Ab negatively correlated with age and C3, but it correlated positively with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in vascultic patients.
conclusionPresence of anti-C1q Ab did not differ between the patients with primary and secondary vasculitis. Anti-C1q Ab titers correlated with younger age, high ESR, and low C3 in patients with vasculitis in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29114186PMC5669508W2992689301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.