Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114178›Full record

ReviewContrast media & molecular imaging2017

Cancer Metabolism and Tumor Heterogeneity: Imaging Perspectives Using MR Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Gigin Lin, Kayvan R Keshari, Jae Mo Park

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. PET/MRI and genetic intrapatient heterogeneity in head and neck cancers.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic Profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gigin LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Imaging Core Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-1058
Kayvan R KeshariDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jae Mo ParkAdvanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7404-6971
Chang Gung University · TWMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TR&D 3: Imaging Carbohydrate MetabolismP41EB015908 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALLOY, CRAIG R · 2012 to 2021
$10.9M
A Clinical MR Scanner for Imaging Hyperpolarized Carbon-13S10RR029119 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALLOY, CRAIG R · 2011 to 2011
$2.2M
A Clinical Polarizer for Carbon-13 (SpinLab)S10OD018468 · OD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALLOY, CRAIG R · 2015 to 2015
$1.0M
Reproducibility of Hyperpolarized Pyruvate Metabolic Imaging in Prostate CancerR01CA195476 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HRICAK, HEDVIG, KESHARI, KAYVAN R · 2016 to 2018
$822k
uCoil NMR platform for robust and high-throughput analysis of in vitro metabolic flux on living cellsR21CA212958 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KESHARI, KAYVAN R · 2017 to 2019
$660k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195476NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212958NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029119NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015908NIH HHS S10 OD018468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cells reprogram their metabolism to maintain viability via genetic mutations and epigenetic alterations, expressing overall dynamic heterogeneity. The complex relaxation mechanisms of nuclear spins provide unique and convertible tissue contrasts, making magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) pertinent imaging tools in both clinics and research. In this review, we summarized MR methods that visualize tumor characteristics and its metabolic phenotypes on an anatomical, microvascular, microstructural, microenvironmental, and metabolomics scale. The review will progress from the utilities of basic spin-relaxation contrasts in cancer imaging to more advanced imaging methods that measure tumor-distinctive parameters such as perfusion, water diffusion, magnetic susceptibility, oxygenation, acidosis, redox state, and cell death. Analytical methods to assess tumor heterogeneity are also reviewed in brief. Although the clinical utility of tumor heterogeneity from imaging is debatable, the quantification of tumor heterogeneity using functional and metabolic MR images with development of robust analytical methods and improved MR methods may offer more critical roles of tumor heterogeneity data in clinics. MRI/MRS can also provide insightful information on pharmacometabolomics, biomarker discovery, disease diagnosis and prognosis, and treatment response. With these future directions in mind, we anticipate the widespread utilization of these MR-based techniques in studying

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNeoplasmsNeovascularization, Pathologic

Identifiers

PMID29114178
PMCPMC5654284
OpenAlexW2761363415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.