Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29113956›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2018

Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system.

Rachel L Winer, Jasmin A Tiro, Diana L Miglioretti, Chris Thayer, Tara Beatty, John Lin, Hongyuan Gao, Kilian Kimbel, Diana S M Buist

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel L WinerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Box 359933, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: rlw@uw.edu.
Jasmin A TiroDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Electronic address: Jasmin.Tiro@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Diana L MigliorettiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Med Sci 1C, Room 145, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: dmiglioretti@ucdavis.edu.
Chris ThayerKaiser Permanente Washington, 2715 Naches Ave SW, PO Box 9010, Renton, WA 98057, USA. Electronic address: thayer.c@ghc.org.
Tara BeattyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: beatty.t@ghc.org.
John LinDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 359933, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Electronic address: indigo@uw.edu.
Hongyuan GaoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: gao.h@ghc.org.
Kilian KimbelKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: kimbel.k@ghc.org.
Diana S M BuistKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: buist.d@ghc.org.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USKaiser Permanente · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Randomized Trial of In-Home Cervical Cancer Screening in Underscreened WomenR01CA168598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WINER, RACHEL L. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who delay or do not attend Papanicolaou (Pap) screening are at increased risk for cervical cancer. Trials in countries with organized screening programs have demonstrated that mailing high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kits to under-screened women increases participation, but U.S. data are lacking. HOME is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial set within a U.S. integrated healthcare delivery system to compare two programmatic approaches for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in under-screened women (>3.4years since last Pap) aged 30-64years: 1) usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach by clinics) and 2) usual care plus mailed hrHPV self-screening kits. Over 2.5years, eligible women were identified through electronic medical record (EMR) data and randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control arm. Women in the intervention arm were mailed kits with pre-paid envelopes to return samples to the central clinical laboratory for hrHPV testing. Results were documented in the EMR to notify women's primary care providers of appropriate follow-up. Primary outcomes are detection and treatment of cervical neoplasia. Secondary outcomes are cervical cancer screening uptake, abnormal screening results, and women's experiences and attitudes towards hrHPV self-sampling and follow-up of hrHPV-positive results (measured through surveys and interviews). The trial was designed to evaluate whether a programmatic strategy incorporating hrHPV self-sampling is effective in promoting adherence to the complete screening process (including follow-up of abnormal screening results and treatment). The objective of this report is to describe the rationale and design of this pragmatic trial.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPostal ServicePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSelf CareSingle-Blind MethodSpecimen HandlingUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerHuman papillomavirusPragmatic clinical trialScreeningSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID29113956
PMCPMC5742021
OpenAlexW2766937701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.