ArticleOncotarget2017
Efficacy of glucocorticoids, vitamin A and caffeine therapies for neonatal mortality in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Vitamin A Supplementation for Prevention of Short-Term Morbidity and Mortality in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe paper aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different therapies in improving survival among preterm infants. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 2017. We assessed studies for eligibility and extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects model was used to evaluate different therapies combined direct comparisons with indirect evidence. Consistency analysis was achieved using node-splitting plots. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank different therapies. Rankings of the competing therapies were also performed.
resultsA total of 42 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for the network meta-analysis. Forest plots demonstrated that dexamethasone (OR = 10.13, 95% CrI: 5.11 to 17.89) and vitamin A (OR = 28.44, 95% CrI: 14.66 to 42.11) is superior to placebo in duration of oxygen supplementation while vitamin A (OR = -29.76, 95% CrI: -57.66 to -1.75) is inferior to placebo with regard to duration of hospitalization. Also, dexamethasone (OR = 0.42, 95% CrI: 0.24 to 0.68) showed lower incidence rate of BPD.SUCRA results showed the superiority of Budesonide based on primary efficacy outcomes. In addition, dexamethasone also showed high efficacy ranking in duration of ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation, and occurrence of BPD. Hydrocortisone was effective in reducing neonatal mortality. No significant difference was found among these drugs.
conclusionsNo significant heterogeneity was found among these drugs. In general, budesonide might have the potential to be the optimal drug for its efficacy in reducing neonatal mortality and BPD, the two most essential outcome measures. Dexamethasone might be the suboptimal drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.