Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29112702›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

CommWalker: correctly evaluating modules in molecular networks in light of annotation bias.

M D Luecken, M J T Page, A J Crosby, S Mason, G Reinert, C M Deane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M D LueckenDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK.
M J T PageDepartment of Informatics, UCB Pharma, Slough SL1 3WE, UK.
A J CrosbyImmunology Therapeutic Area, UCB Pharma, Slough SL1 3WE, UK.
S MasonImmunology Therapeutic Area, UCB Pharma, Slough SL1 3WE, UK.
G ReinertDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK.
C M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Detecting novel functional modules in molecular networks is an important step in biological research. In the absence of gold standard functional modules, functional annotations are often used to verify whether detected modules/communities have biological meaning. However, as we show, the uneven distribution of functional annotations means that such evaluation methods favor communities of well-studied proteins. Results: We propose a novel framework for the evaluation of communities as functional modules. Our proposed framework, CommWalker, takes communities as inputs and evaluates them in their local network environment by performing short random walks. We test CommWalker's ability to overcome annotation bias using input communities from four community detection methods on two protein interaction networks. We find that modules accepted by CommWalker are similarly co-expressed as those accepted by current methods. Crucially, CommWalker performs well not only in well-annotated regions, but also in regions otherwise obscured by poor annotation. CommWalker community prioritization both faithfully captures well-validated communities and identifies functional modules that may correspond to more novel biology. Availability and implementation: The CommWalker algorithm is freely available at opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources or as a docker image on the Docker Hub at hub.docker.com/r/lueckenmd/commwalker/. Contact: deane@stats.ox.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Molecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansProtein Interaction Mapping

Identifiers

PMID29112702
PMCPMC5860269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.