Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29112683›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Targeting de novo lipogenesis as a novel approach in anti-cancer therapy.

Katharina Stoiber, Olga Nagło, Carla Pernpeintner, Siwei Zhang, Andreas Koeberle, Melanie Ulrich, Oliver Werz, Rolf Müller, Stefan Zahler, Theobald Lohmüller and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Acetyl-CoA Carboxylases and Diseases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Targeting Cancer Metabolism and Current Anti-Cancer Drugs.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina StoiberDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Olga NagłoDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Carla PernpeintnerNanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Schellingstraße 4, Munich, Germany.
Siwei ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KoeberleChair of Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Philosophenweg 14, Jena, Germany.
Melanie UlrichDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Oliver WerzChair of Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Philosophenweg 14, Jena, Germany.
Rolf MüllerDepartment of Microbial Natural Products, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research and Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Saarland University, Campus E8.1, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Stefan ZahlerDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Theobald LohmüllerNanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Schellingstraße 4, Munich, Germany.
Jochen FeldmannNanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Schellingstraße 4, Munich, Germany.
Simone BraigDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Butenandstr. 5-13, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENanosystems Initiative Munich · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough altered membrane physiology has been discussed within the context of cancer, targeting membrane characteristics by drugs being an attractive therapeutic strategy has received little attention so far.

methodsVarious acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1), and fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitors (like Soraphen A and Cerulenin) as well as genetic knockdown approaches were employed to study the effects of disturbed phospholipid composition on membrane properties and its functional impact on cancer progression. By using state-of-the-art methodologies such as LC-MS/MS, optical tweezers measurements of giant plasma membrane vesicles and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis, membrane characteristics were examined. Confocal laser scanning microscopy, proximity ligation assays, immunoblotting as well as migration, invasion and proliferation experiments unravelled the functional relevance of membrane properties in vitro and in vivo.

resultsBy disturbing the deformability and lateral fluidity of cellular membranes, the dimerisation, localisation and recycling of cancer-relevant transmembrane receptors is compromised. Consequently, impaired activation of growth factor receptor signalling cascades results in abrogated tumour growth and metastasis in different in vitro and in vivo models.

conclusionsThis study highlights the field of membrane properties as a promising druggable cellular target representing an innovative strategy for development of anti-cancer agents.

Indexed as

Acetyl-CoA CarboxylaseCell Line, TumorCell MembraneCell MovementCell ProliferationCeruleninEnzyme InhibitorsFatty Acid Synthase, Type IGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansLipogenesisMacrolidesMembrane FluidityMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsACACA protein, humanAcetyl-CoA CarboxylaseCeruleninEnzyme InhibitorsFASN protein, humanFatty Acid Synthase, Type IMacrolidesPhospholipidssoraphen A

Identifiers

PMID29112683
PMCPMC5765225
OpenAlexW2767381389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.