Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29112631›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2018

Economic Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions From the Employer Perspective: A Systematic Review.

Aikaterini Grimani, Gunnar Bergström, Martha Isabel Riaño Casallas, Emmanuel Aboagye, Irene Jensen, Malin Lohela-Karlsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Economic Evaluations of Physical Exercise at Work: A Scoping Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Economic evaluations in occupational health: what brings the best bang for the buck?Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aikaterini GrimaniUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (Dr Grimani, Dr Bergström, Aboagye, Drs Jensen, Lohela-Karlsson), Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia (Casallas), and Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Bogotá, Colombia (Casallas).
Gunnar Bergström
Martha Isabel Riaño Casallas
Emmanuel Aboagye
Irene Jensen
Malin Lohela-Karlsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of occupational safety and health interventions from the employer perspective.

methodsA comprehensive literature search (2005 to 2016) in five electronic databases was conducted. Pre-2005 studies were identified from the reference lists of previous studies and systematic reviews, which have similar objective to those of this search.

resultsA total of 19 randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included, targeting diverse health problems in a number of settings. Few studies included organizational-level interventions. When viewed in relation to the methodological quality and the sufficiency of economic evidence, five of 11 cost-effective occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions appear to be promising.

conclusionThe present systematic review highlights the need for high-quality economic evidence to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of OSH interventions, especially at organizational-level, in all areas of worker health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational HealthProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29112631
PMCPMC5794237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.