Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29112466›Full record

ArticleHigh altitude medicine & biology2017

The Effect of Inspiratory Resistance on Exercise Performance and Perception in Moderate Normobaric Hypoxia.

Yongsuk Seo, Jeremiah Vaughan, Tyler D Quinn, Brittany Followay, Raymond Roberge, Ellen L Glickman, Jung-Hyun Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in High altitude medicine & biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongsuk Seo1 National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jeremiah Vaughan2 Department of Exercise Physiology, Kent State University , Kent, Ohio.
Tyler D Quinn1 National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Brittany Followay2 Department of Exercise Physiology, Kent State University , Kent, Ohio.
Raymond Roberge1 National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ellen L Glickman2 Department of Exercise Physiology, Kent State University , Kent, Ohio.
Jung-Hyun Kim1 National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kent State University · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seo, Yongsuk, Jeremiah Vaughan, Tyler D. Quinn, Brittany Followay, Raymond Roberge, Ellen L. Glickman, and Jung-Hyun Kim. The effect of inspiratory resistance on exercise performance and perception in moderate normobaric hypoxia. High Alt Med Biol. 18:417-424, 2017. PURPOSE: Respirators are simple and efficient in protecting workers against toxic airborne substances; however, their use may limit the physical performance of workers. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of inspiratory resistance on physical performance and breathing perception in normobaric hypoxia.

methodNine healthy men wore a tight-fitting respiratory mask outfitted with one of four different inspiratory resistors (R) (0, 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 cm H

resultsMaximal power output at R7.5 was significantly lower than R0 (p = 0.016) and R1.5 (p = 0.035). Respiration rate was significantly reduced at R4.5 (p = 0.011) and R7.5 (p ≤ 0.001) compared with R0. Minute ventilation was significantly decreased in R7.5 compared with R0 (p = 0.003), R1.5 (p = 0.010), and R4.5 (p = 0.016), whereas VO

conclusionsAdded inspiratory resistance limited maximal power output and increased perceptions of BC and BE in normobaric hypoxia. However, low-to-moderate inspiratory resistance did not have a deleterious effect on VO

Indexed as

Respiratory Protective DevicesAdultAtmospheric PressureExerciseExercise TestHealthy VolunteersHumansHypoxiaInhalationMaleOxygen ConsumptionPerceptionPhysical ExertionPulmonary VentilationRespiratory RateWork of Breathingbreathing comfortbreathing effortexercise performanceinspiratory resistancenormobaric hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID29112466
PMCPMC10542912
OpenAlexW2767578990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.