Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29112324›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2018

De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole-genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus.

Javier Montero-Pau, José Blanca, Aureliano Bombarely, Peio Ziarsolo, Cristina Esteras, Carlos Martí-Gómez, María Ferriol, Pedro Gómez, Manuel Jamilena, Lukas Mueller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiomics analysis ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative complete chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Javier Montero-PauInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-8157
José BlancaInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Aureliano BombarelyDepartment of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Peio ZiarsoloInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina EsterasInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Martí-GómezInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
María FerriolInstituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo (IAM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro GómezIFAPA Centro La Mojonera, La Mojonera, Almería, Spain.
Manuel JamilenaDepartment of Biology and Geology, Research Centers CIAIMBITAL and CeiA3, University of Almeria, Almería, Spain.
Lukas MuellerBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Belén PicóInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Joaquín CañizaresInstitute for the Conservation and Breeding of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cucurbita genus (squashes, pumpkins and gourds) includes important domesticated species such as C. pepo, C. maxima and C. moschata. In this study, we present a high-quality draft of the zucchini (C. pepo) genome. The assembly has a size of 263 Mb, a scaffold N50 of 1.8 Mb and 34 240 gene models. It includes 92% of the conserved BUSCO core gene set, and it is estimated to cover 93.0% of the genome. The genome is organized in 20 pseudomolecules that represent 81.4% of the assembly, and it is integrated with a genetic map of 7718 SNPs. Despite the small genome size, three independent lines of evidence support that the C. pepo genome is the result of a whole-genome duplication: the topology of the gene family phylogenies, the karyotype organization and the distribution of 4DTv distances. Additionally, 40 transcriptomes of 12 species of the genus were assembled and analysed together with all the other published genomes of the Cucurbitaceae family. The duplication was detected in all the Cucurbita species analysed, including C. maxima and C. moschata, but not in the more distant cucurbits belonging to the Cucumis and Citrullus genera, and it is likely to have occurred 30 ± 4 Mya in the ancestral species that gave rise to the genus.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationGenome, PlantTranscriptomeCucurbitacropCucurbitaceaegenometranscriptomewhole-genome duplicationzucchini

Identifiers

PMID29112324
PMCPMC5978595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.