Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110946›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2018

Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Thomas L Edwards, Charles L Cottriall, Kanmin Xue, Matthew P Simunovic, James D Ramsden, Eberhart Zrenner, Robert E MacLaren

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03561922 naterminatednot on this map

Impact on Daily Life of Patients Using the Subretinal Implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS

TypeinterventionalSponsorRetina Implant AGRan2018 to 2019Enrolled2ConditionsRetinal Degeneration, Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Primarily Involving Sensory RetinaArmsRETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
NCT03629899 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Early Feasibility Study of the RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS in Blind Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa

TypeinterventionalSponsorWills EyeRan2019 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsRetinitis PigmentosaArmsRETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural Vision Restoration in Ophthalmology.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas L EdwardsNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: thomas.edwards@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Charles L CottriallOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kanmin XueNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew P SimunovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
James D RamsdenOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eberhart ZrennerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Department of Health II-C2-0713-20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the initial efficacy results of the Retina Implant Alpha AMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) for partial restoration of vision in end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

designProspective, single-arm, investigator-sponsored interventional clinical trial. Within-participant control comprising residual vision with the retinal implant switched ON versus OFF in the implanted eye.

participantsThe Retina Implant Alpha AMS was implanted into the worse-seeing eye of 6 participants with end-stage RP and no useful perception of light vision. Eligibility criteria included previous normal vision for ≥12 years and no significant ocular or systemic comorbidity.

methodsVision assessments were scheduled at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postimplantation. They comprised tabletop object recognition tasks, a self-assessment mobility questionnaire, and screen-based tests including Basic Light and Motion (BaLM), grating acuity, and greyscale contrast discrimination. A full-field stimulus test (FST) was also performed.

main outcome measuresImprovement in activities of daily living, recognition tasks, and assessments of light perception with the implant ON compared with OFF.

resultsAll 6 participants underwent successful implantation. Light perception and temporal resolution with the implant ON were achieved in all participants. Light localization was achieved with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4) in whom the chip was not functioning optimally because of a combination of iatrogenic intraoperative implant damage and incorrect implantation. Implant ON correct grating detections (which were at chance level with implant OFF) were recorded in the other 5 participants, ranging from 0.1 to 3.33 cycles/degree on 1 occasion. The ability to locate high-contrast tabletop objects not seen with the implant OFF was partially restored with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4). There were 2 incidents of conjunctival erosion and 1 inferotemporal macula-on retinal detachment, which were successfully repaired, and 2 incidents of inadvertent damage to the implant during surgery (P3 and P4).

conclusionsThe Alpha AMS subretinal implant improved visual performance in 5 of 6 participants and has exhibited ongoing function for up to 24 months. Although implantation surgery remains challenging, new developments such as OCT microscope guidance added refinements to the surgical technique.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingVisual ProsthesisElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaSingle-Blind MethodTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID29110946
PMCPMC5818267
OpenAlexW2766112309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.