Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110711›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series.

Paulo Kertzman, Nikolaus B M Császár, John P Furia, Christoph Schmitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulo KertzmanDepartamento de Ortopedia, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nikolaus B M CsászárExtracorporeal Shock Wave Research Unit, Chair of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr 11, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
John P FuriaSUN Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Division of Evangelical Community Hospital, 900 Buffalo Road, Lewisburg, PA, 17837, USA.
Christoph SchmitzExtracorporeal Shock Wave Research Unit, Chair of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr 11, D-80336, Munich, Germany. christoph_schmitz@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-1241
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECommunity Hospital · USFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial body of evidence supports the use of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT) in the non-invasive treatment of fracture nonunions. On the other hand, virtually no studies exist on the use of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) for this indication.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 22 patients treated with rESWT for fracture nonunions of superficial bones that failed to heal despite initial surgical fixation in most cases. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was applied without anesthesia in three rESWT sessions on average, with one rESWT session per week and 3000 radial extracorporeal shock waves at an energy flux density of 0.18 mJ/mm

resultsSix months after rESWT radiographic union was confirmed in 16 out of 22 patients (73%), which is similar to the success rate achieved in comparable studies using fESWT. There were no side effects. The tibia was the most common treatment site (10/22) and 70% of tibia nonunions healed within 6 months after rESWT. Overall, successfully treated patients showed a mean time interval of 8.8 ± 0.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean) months between initial fracture and commencement of rESWT whereas in unsuccessfully treated patients the mean interval was 26.0 ± 10.1 months (p < 0.05). In unsuccessful tibia cases, the mean interval was 43.3 ± 13.9 months.

conclusionsRadial extracorporeal shock wave therapy appears to be an effective and safe alternative in the management of fracture nonunions of superficial bones if diagnosed early and no fESWT device is available. The promising preliminary results of the present case series should encourage the implementation of randomized controlled trials for the early use of rESWT in fracture nonunions.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyAdolescentAdultAgedBone RegenerationFemaleFractures, UnunitedHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBoneFocused extracorporeal shock wave therapyFractureNonunionRadial extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Identifiers

PMID29110711
PMCPMC5674749
OpenAlexW2767280705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.