ArticleBMC genomics2017
Large-scale analysis reveals that the genome features of simple sequence repeats are generally conserved at the family level in insects.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative mitogenomics of six Thrips species reveals conserved architecture, repeat variation, and nucleotide composition bias.Genetica · 2026Article
- Genomic distribution characteristics and interspecific differences of microsatellite landscapes in Felidae.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The repertoire of short tandem repeats across the tree of life.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
- The development of ideal insertion and deletion (InDel) markers and initial indel map variation in cucumber using re-sequenced data.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Distribution Patterns of Microsatellites Across the Genomes of Reptiles.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Evolutionary and phylogenetic insights from the mitochondrial genomic analysis of Diceraeus melacanthus and D. furcatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development and validation of genome-wide SSR molecular markers of Tapes dorsatus.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Bean Blossom Thrips (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative genomics reveals insights into anuran genome size evolution.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Omics in the Red Palm WeevilInsects · 2023Review
- Comparison of microsatellite distribution in the genomes of Pteropus vampyrus and Miniopterus natalensis (Chiroptera).BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Development of Nuclear DNA Markers for Applications in Genetic Diversity Study of Oil Palm-Pollinating Weevil Populations.Insects · 2023Article
- Mutation and selection processes regulating short tandem repeats give rise to genetic and phenotypic diversity across species.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Review
- Microsatellite Variation in the Most Devastating Beetle Pests (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) of Agricultural and Forest Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Survey and Development of the First Microsatellite Markers Database (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- An empirical analysis of mtSSRs: could microsatellite distribution patterns explain the evolution of mitogenomes in plants?Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- Insights into the origin of the invasive populations of Trioza erytreae in Europe using microsatellite markers and mtDNA barcoding approaches.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimple sequence repeats (SSR), also called microsatellites, have been widely used as genetic markers, and have been extensively studied in some model insects. At present, the genomes of more than 100 insect species are available. However, the features of SSRs in most insect genomes remain largely unknown.
resultsWe identified 15.01 million SSRs across 136 insect genomes. The number of identified SSRs was positively associated with genome size in insects, but the frequency and density per megabase of genomes were not. Most insect SSRs (56.2-93.1%) were perfect (no mismatch). Imperfect (at least one mismatch) SSRs (average length 22-73 bp) were longer than perfect SSRs (16-30 bp). The most abundant insect SSRs were the di- and trinucleotide types, which accounted for 27.2% and 22.0% of all SSRs, respectively. On average, 59.1%, 36.8%, and 3.7% of insect SSRs were located in intergenic, intronic, and exonic regions, respectively. The percentages of various types of SSRs were similar among insects from the same family. However, they were dissimilar among insects from different families within orders. We carried out a phylogenetic analysis using the SSR frequencies. Species from the same family were generally clustered together in the evolutionary tree. However, insects from the same order but not in the same family did not cluster together. These results indicated that although SSRs undergo rapid expansions and contractions in different populations of the same species, the general genomic features of insect SSRs remain conserved at the family level.
conclusionMillions of insect SSRs were identified and their genome features were analyzed. Most insect SSRs were perfect and were located in intergenic regions. We presented evidence that the variance of insect SSRs accumulated after the differentiation of insect families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.