Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110687›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Effects of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional performance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Amanda Vitória Lacerda de Araújo, Valéria Ribeiro Nogueira Barbosa, Gilma Serra Galdino, Felipe Fregni, Thais Massetti, Sara Lynn Fontes, Danilo de Oliveira Silva, Talita Dias da Silva, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro, James Tonks and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02899637 (Effects of High-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Performance of Subjects With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02899637 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of High-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Performance of Subjects With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2016 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsActive high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor ability, neurophysiological changes, mental health, and activities of daily living in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Amanda Vitória Lacerda de AraújoSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH - USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valéria Ribeiro Nogueira BarbosaDepartment of Physiotherapy - UEPB, Paraíba State University, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Gilma Serra GaldinoDepartment of Physiotherapy - UEPB, Paraíba State University, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Felipe FregniHarvard Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Thais MassettiSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH - USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sara Lynn FontesFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Danilo de Oliveira SilvaPhysical Therapy Program - UNESP, State University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Talita Dias da SilvaSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH - USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Bandeira de Mello MonteiroSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH - USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
James TonksUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Fernando Henrique MagalhãesSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH - USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. fhmagalhaes@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba · BRBerenson Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation · USUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been investigated as a new tool in neurological rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, due to the inconsistent results regarding the effects of rTMS in people with SCI, a randomized controlled double-blind crossover trial is needed to clarify the clinical utility and to assess the effect size of rTMS intervention in this population. Therefore, this paper describes a study protocol designed to investigate whether the use of rTMS can improve the motor and sensory function, as well as reduce spasticity in patients with incomplete SCI.

methodsA double-blind randomized sham-controlled crossover trial will be performed by enrolling 20 individuals with incomplete SCI. Patients who are at least six months post incomplete SCI (aged 18-60 years) will be recruited through referral by medical practitioners or therapists. Individuals will be randomly assigned to either group 1 or group 2 in a 1:1 ratio, with ten individuals in each group. The rTMS protocol will include ten sessions of high-frequency rTMS (5 Hz) over the bilateral lower-limb motor area positioned at the vertex (Cz). Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline and after rTMS active and sham. DISCUSSION: rTMS has produced positive results in treating individuals with physical impairments; thus, it might be promising in the SCI population. The results of this study may provide new insights to motor rehabilitation thereby contributing towards the better usage of rTMS in the SCI population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02899637 . Registered on 25 August 2016.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilClinical ProtocolsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityMuscle SpasticityNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignIncomplete spinal cord injuryMotor rehabilitationNon-invasive brain stimulationPlasticityRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29110687
PMCPMC5674824
OpenAlexW2767833420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.