Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110511›Full record

ArticleCartilage2018

Decision Algorithms for the Retreatment with Viscosupplementation in Patients Suffering from Knee Osteoarthritis: Recommendations from the EUROpean VIScosupplementation COnsensus Group (EUROVISCO).

Raghu Raman, Yves Henrotin, Xavier Chevalier, Alberto Migliore, Jörg Jerosch, Jordi Montfort, Hervé Bard, Dominique Baron, Pascal Richette, Thierry Conrozier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of intra-articular injection of parecoxibWorld journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Raghu Raman1 Academic Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Yves Henrotin2 Bone and Cartilage Research Unit, Université de Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
Xavier Chevalier3 Paris XII University, UPEC, Department of Rheumatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France.
Alberto Migliore4 U.O.S. of Rheumatology, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.
Jörg Jerosch5 Orthopedic Department, Johanna-Etienne-Hospital, Neuss, Germany.
Jordi Montfort6 Servei de Reumatologia, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Hervé Bard7 Department of Rheumatology. Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
Dominique Baron8 Centre de réadaptation fonctionnelle de Lannion-Trestel, Trévou-Tréguignec, France.
Pascal Richette9 Université Paris Diderot, UFR médicale, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Thierry Conrozier10 Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Castle Hill Hospital · GBCentre Hospitalier Lannion Trestel · FRHôpital Européen · FRJohanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus · DEL'Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté · FROspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITParc de Salut · ESUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Viscosupplementation (VS) is a symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Although systematic reviews of its repeat use showed favorable benefit/risk ratio, no study has focused on the indication of retreatment. Methods A task force was created to look at issues regarding retreatment with VS in knee osteoarthritis. An attempt was made to reach consensus on several issues: (1) to define treatment "success" and "failure," (2) to determine when to retreat patients successfully treated by a previous VS, (3) to determine how to retreat patients in whom VS failed, (4) to define what to do in case of adverse reaction following previous VS, and (5) to examine the interests of soluble biomarkers to manage retreatment. After debate and review of literature the working group voted on 88 issues. Two "decision trees" were built based on the results of the votes. Results In case of failure, the authors draw attention to the need of a rigorous clinical and radiological analysis, and consider evidence-based medicine. When VS was previously successful, retreatment can be considered after recurrence or increase in pain. However, in subjects with high risk of disease progression, in young patients, and in professional sportsmen, retreatment could be considered systematically, because of the probability of hyaluronic acid to slow osteoarthritis progression. Evidence on soluble biomarkers was not considered as enough strong to support their use as decision tools for patient retreatment. Conclusion The decision algorithms are intended to facilitate consideration of the therapeutic options, in patients with knee osteoarthritis previously treated with VS.

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneeRetreatmentViscosupplementationAlgorithmsBiomarkersDecision MakingDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularTreatment OutcomeViscosupplementsBiomarkersHyaluronic AcidViscosupplementsbiomarkersdiagnosisdiagnosticsintraarticular deliveryjoint involvedkneeosteoarthritisprocedurestherapeutic deliverytissue lubrication

Identifiers

PMID29110511
PMCPMC6042033
OpenAlexW2589977624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.