Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110352›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry: Proposal for a polytomous scoring system.

Juana Gómez-Benito, Ángela I Berrío, Georgina Guilera, Emilio Rojo, Scot Purdon, Oscar Pino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry: Proposal for a polytomous scoring system.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juana Gómez-BenitoQuantitative Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ángela I BerríoQuantitative Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2064-4594
Georgina GuileraQuantitative Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Emilio RojoBenito Menni CASM, Germanes Hospitalàries, Barcelona, Spain.
Scot PurdonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Oscar PinoQuantitative Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry is a simple, fast, and easy to administer scale that has been validated in clinical and community samples. The aim of this study was to propose a polytomous scoring system for the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and to demonstrate its functioning, thus providing new and complementary information regarding the utility and precision of this screening tool. Three hundred seventy-six Spanish patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder were evaluated. A polytomous scoring system was generated and analyzed by means of the partial credit model. Category assessment revealed optimal functioning after collapsing the 7-category system to 1 with either 5 or 4 categories, depending on the item. The proposed polytomous scoring system shows good psychometric properties and an adequate fit to the partial credit model. These results provide further confirmation of the test's utility in clinical settings and of its suitability for detecting cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsSchizophreniaYoung Adultcognitive impairmentPCMschizophreniaSCIP

Identifiers

PMID29110352
PMCPMC6877218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.