Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110288›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update.

Ami E Iskandrian, Vasken Dilsizian, Ernest V Garcia, Rob S Beanlands, Manuel Cerqueira, Prem Soman, Daniel S Berman, Alberto Cuocolo, Andrew J Einstein, Charity J Morgan and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk-relatedEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Trial
  2. Cardiovascular imaging in cardio-oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Low-dose stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. My warranty has expired: I need to be retested.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Hybrid imaging and publishing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  9. The continual innovation of commercial PET/CT solutions in nuclear cardiology: Siemens Healthineers.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

Ami E IskandrianDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 318 LHRB/ 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. aiskand@uab.edu.
Vasken DilsizianUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21201, USA.
Ernest V GarciaEmory University, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
Rob S BeanlandsUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Manuel CerqueiraCleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Prem SomanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel S BermanCedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alberto CuocoloUniversity of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Andrew J EinsteinColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Charity J MorganUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Fadi G HageUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Heinrich R SchelbertUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeroen J BaxLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joseph C WuStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Leslee J ShawEmory University, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
Mehran M SadeghiYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nagara TamakiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Philipp A KaufmannUniversity Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Robert GroplerWashington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sharmila DorbalaHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
William Van DeckerTemple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USEmory University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCase Western Reserve University · USColumbia University · USHarvard University Press · USHokkaido University · JPLeiden University Medical Center · NLStanford University · USTemple University · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the second term of our commitment to Journal begins, we, the editors, would like to reflect on a few topics that have relevance today. These include prognostication and paradigm shifts; Serial testing: How to handle data? Is the change in perfusion predictive of outcome and which one? Ischemia-guided therapy: fractional flow reserve vs perfusion vs myocardial blood flow; positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Rubidium-82 vs N-13 ammonia vs F-18 Flurpiridaz; How to differentiate microvascular disease from 3-vessel disease by PET? The imaging scene outside the United States, what are the differences and similarities? Radiation exposure; Special issues with the new cameras? Is attenuation correction needed? Are there normal databases and are these specific to each camera system? And finally, hybrid imaging with single-photon emission tomography or PET combined with computed tomography angiography or coronary calcium score. We hope these topics are of interest to our readers.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAmmoniaCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsDatabases, FactualFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMicrocirculationMultimodal ImagingMyocardial IschemiaNitrogen RadioisotopesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisAmmoniaBMS 747158-02Nitrogen-13Nitrogen RadioisotopesPyridazinesRubidium-82Rubidium Radioisotopescoronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusion imagingnuclear imagingpositron emission tomographyprognosissingle-photon emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID29110288
OpenAlexW1254341692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.