Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110160›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

Disability at Work: A Look Back and Forward.

Lisa Schur, Kyongji Han, Andrea Kim, Mason Ameri, Peter Blanck, Douglas Kruse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa SchurRutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Kyongji HanBaylor University, Waco, USA.
Andrea KimSchool of Business, Sungkyunkwan University, #33515 Business Bldg. 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03063, South Korea. akim@skku.edu.
Mason AmeriRutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Peter BlanckSyracuse University, Syracuse, USA.
Douglas KruseRutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.

Funding

Center on Effective Delivery of Rehabilitation Technology by Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies H133A090004Southeast Disability & Business Technical Assistance Center H133A060094The Asset Accumulation and Economic Self-Sufficiency Project H133A090014the Burton Blatt Institute from: (a) the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), U.S. Department of Education (i) "Demand Side Employment Placement Models," H133A060033the Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP), U.S. Department of Labor, "Disability Case Study Research Consortium," #E-9-4-6-0107the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) for the "Southeast Region TACE Center H264A080021U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) H133B980042-99
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This article presents new evidence on employment barriers and workplace disparities facing employees with disabilities, linking the disparities to employee attitudes. Methods Analyses use the 2006 General Social Survey to connect disability to workplace disparities and attitudes in a structural equation model. Results Compared to employees without disabilities, those with disabilities report: lower pay levels, job security, and flexibility; more negative treatment by management; and, lower job satisfaction but similar organizational commitment and turnover intention. The lower satisfaction is mediated by lower job security, less job flexibility, and more negative views of management and co-worker relations. Conclusion Prior research and the present findings show that people with disabilities experience employment disparities that limit their income, security, and overall quality of work life. Technology plays an increasingly important role in decreasing employment disparities. However, there also should be increased targeted efforts by government, employers, insurers, occupational rehabilitation providers, and disability groups to address workplace barriers faced by employees with disabilities, and by those with disabilities seeking to return to work.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMalePersonnel SelectionPersonnel TurnoverPersons with DisabilitiesReturn to WorkSalaries and Fringe BenefitsWorkplaceDisabilityJob characteristicsJob satisfactionOrganizational commitmentTurnover intention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.