Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110122›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018

[Suprachoroidal minimally invasive glaucoma surgery : Procedures and clinical outcome].

C Erb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Can We Ever Win with a Suprachoroidal Implant?Journal of current glaucoma practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

C ErbAugenklinik am Wittenbergplatz, Kleiststr. 23-26, 10787, Berlin, Deutschland. erb.glaukom@gmail.com.
Wittenberg University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uveoscleral outflow route is via the ciliary muscles into the suprachoroidal spaces and then to the orbital blood and lymph systems. The main driving force behind this uveoscleral outflow is the high oncotic pressure in the choroidal vessels. Currently, the CyPass microstent is the only available suprachoroidal device for ab interno minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. The CyPass achieves a maximum reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) to 16-17 mm Hg over 12-24 months and is approved for mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma. The CyPass is an easy to use minimally invasive glaucoma surgery stent operation and has few intraoperative as well as short and long-term complications. Postoperative management is unproblematic and the postoperative burden for patients is low, which leads to rapid recovery of patients; however, the correct selection of glaucoma patients is crucial for maintaining a sustainable success rate. Long-term studies are necessary to demonstrate the persistence of the IOP lowering effect.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsHumansIntraocular PressureTonometry, OcularConvalescenceOncotic pressureOpen-angle glaucomaStentUveoscleral outflow

Identifiers

PMID29110122
OpenAlexW2768657205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.