Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29110046›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Supplementary optical techniques for the detection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer].

S Aeishen, Y Dawood, S Papadoukakis, M Horstmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S AeishenKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, MKH St. Josefshospital, Krefeld-Uerdingen, Kurfürstenstraße 69, 47829, Krefeld, Deutschland.
Y DawoodKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, MKH St. Josefshospital, Krefeld-Uerdingen, Kurfürstenstraße 69, 47829, Krefeld, Deutschland.
S PapadoukakisKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, MKH St. Josefshospital, Krefeld-Uerdingen, Kurfürstenstraße 69, 47829, Krefeld, Deutschland.
M HorstmannKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, MKH St. Josefshospital, Krefeld-Uerdingen, Kurfürstenstraße 69, 47829, Krefeld, Deutschland. marcushorstmann@gmx.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White light cystoscopy (WL) is the gold standard for the detection of bladder cancer. It can be performed using a rigid or flexible urethrocystoscope. With the more recent introduction of high definition (HD) techniques, WL cystoscopy has been decisively improved. Supplementary optical techniques are also used to improve the detection of bladder cancer. Among these are photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), narrow-band imaging (NBI), S‑technologies of IMAGE1 S, optical coherence tomography (OCT), confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), and Raman spectroscopy. The aim of the present work is to introduce the techniques and to discuss their current role and future potential in the detection of bladder cancer.

Indexed as

CystoscopyDiagnostic ImagingHumansNarrow Band ImagingSpectrum Analysis, RamanTomography, Optical CoherenceUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystoscopyNarrow band imagingNonmuscle invasive bladder cancerOptical imaging techniquesPhotodynamic diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID29110046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.