ReviewDer Internist2018
[Modern treatment of primary biliary cholangitis].
Review in Der Internist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For nearly 30 years ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) represented the only pharmacological treatment option available for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This changed at the end of 2016 when obeticholic acid was licensed in Europe for PBC patients not responding to UDCA. Novel treatment concepts involving the modulation of nuclear receptor signaling in cholestatic and other liver diseases have led to a host of new potential options, studies and drug candidates for the treatment of PBC. The analysis of large multinational cohorts has additionally confirmed the effectiveness of UDCA in slowing PBC progression, and has led to the development of new definitions for the risk assessment of PBC patients under therapy, which will be an asset for clinical decision making. One issue that remains unresolved is the therapeutic management of extrahepatic symptoms associated with PBC, namely fatigue and pruritus, which are the main factors influencing the quality of life of affected individuals. Their pathophysiological basis is poorly understood and treatment remains unsatisfactory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.