ArticleComputational & theoretical chemistry2017
Error assessment in molecular dynamics trajectories using computed NMR chemical shifts.
Article in Computational & theoretical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate chemical shifts for the atoms in molecular mechanics (MD) trajectories can be obtained from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations that depend solely on the coordinates of the atoms in the localized regions surrounding atoms of interest. If these coordinates are correct and the sample size is adequate, the ensemble average of these chemical shifts should be equal to the chemical shifts obtained from NMR spectroscopy. If this is not the case, the coordinates must be incorrect. We have utilized this fact to quantify the errors associated with the backbone atoms in MD simulations of proteins. A library of regional conformers containing 169,499 members was constructed from 6 model proteins. The chemical shifts associated with the backbone atoms in each of these conformers was obtained from QM calculations using density functional theory at the B3LYP level with a 6-311+G(2d,p) basis set. Chemical shifts were assigned to each backbone atom in each MD simulation frame using a template matching approach. The ensemble average of these chemical shifts was compared to chemical shifts from NMR spectroscopy. A large systematic error was identified that affected the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.