Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109697›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2017

Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Type 1 Diabetic Patients: Relation with Patients' Age and Disease Duration.

Adolfo Arcangeli, Elena Lastraioli, Barbara Piccini, Massimo D'Amico, Lorenzo Lenzi, Serena Pillozzi, Maria Calabrese, Sonia Toni, Annarosa Arcangeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Transcriptional Landscape ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Type 1 diabetes patients increase CXCR4Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Circulating Endothelial Cells, Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells, and Circulating Microparticles in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adolfo ArcangeliDiabetology Unit, Prato Hospital, Prato, Italy.
Elena LastraioliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Barbara PicciniDiabetology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Massimo D'AmicoDI.V.A.L Toscana Srl, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Lorenzo LenziDiabetology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Serena PillozziDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Maria CalabreseDiabetology Unit, Prato Hospital, Prato, Italy.
Sonia ToniDI.V.A.L Toscana Srl, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Annarosa ArcangeliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCirculating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) have been reported to be dysfunctional in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, accounting for the vascular damage and the ensuing high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) characteristic of this disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the number of circulating cEPCs in type 1 DM (T1DM) patients, without clinical vascular damage, of different ages and with different disease duration.

methodsAn observational, clinical-based prospective study was performed on T1DM patients enrolled in two clinical centers. cEPCs were determined by flow cytometry, determining the number of CD34/CD133/VEGFR2-positive cells within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

resultsThe number of cEPCs was lower in adult T1DM patients, whilst higher in childhood/young patients, compared to controls of the same age range. When patients were grouped into two age groups (≥ or <20 years) (and categorized on the basis of the duration of the disease), the number of cEPCs in young (<20 years) patients was higher compared with older subjects, regardless of disease duration. A subset of patients with very high cEPCs was identified in the <20 years group.

conclusionThere is an association between the number of cEPCs and patients' age: childhood/young T1DM patients have significantly higher levels of cEPCs, respect to adult T1DM patients. Such difference is maintained also when the disease lasts for more than 10 years. The very high levels of cEPCs, identified in a subset of childhood/young patients, might protect vessels against endothelial dysfunction and damage. Such protection would be less operative in older subjects, endowed with lower cEPC numbers, in which complications are known to develop more easily.

Indexed as

diabetes durationendothelial progenitor cellsflow cytometrypatients’ agetype 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID29109697
PMCPMC5660067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.