Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109524›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2018

Navigating complexity to breed disease-resistant crops.

Rebecca Nelson, Tyr Wiesner-Hanks, Randall Wisser, Peter Balint-Kurti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Role of the Genetic Background in Resistance to Plant Viruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca NelsonSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Tyr Wiesner-HanksSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Randall WisserDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
Peter Balint-KurtiUnited States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases are responsible for substantial crop losses each year and pose a threat to global food security and agricultural sustainability. Improving crop resistance to pathogens through breeding is an environmentally sound method for managing disease and minimizing these losses. However, it is challenging to breed varieties with resistance that is effective, stable and broad-spectrum. Recent advances in genetic and genomic technologies have contributed to a better understanding of the complexity of host-pathogen interactions and have identified some of the genes and mechanisms that underlie resistance. This new knowledge is benefiting crop improvement through better-informed breeding strategies that utilize diverse forms of resistance at different scales, from the genome of a single plant to the plant varieties deployed across a region.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenes, PlantGenetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant BreedingPlant Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29109524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.