Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109483›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Safety of Nonporous Silica Nanoparticles in Human Corneal Endothelial Cells.

Ja-Yeon Kim, Joo-Hee Park, Martha Kim, Hyejoong Jeong, Jinkee Hong, Roy S Chuck, Choul Yong Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery for Vascular Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ocular Nanomedicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nanotechnology for Topical Drug Delivery to the Anterior Segment of the Eye.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ja-Yeon KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7605-0053
Joo-Hee ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8662-6279
Martha KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.
Hyejoong JeongSchool of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jinkee HongSchool of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Roy S ChuckDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Choul Yong ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. oph0112@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonporous silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are promising drug carrier platforms for intraocular drug delivery. In this study, we investigated the safety of three different sizes of SiNPs (50, 100, and 150 nm) in a human corneal endothelial cell (HCEC) line, B4G12. The HCECs were exposed to different concentrations (0, 25, 50, and 100 µg/ml) of three sizes of SiNPs for up to 48 h. Cellular viability, autophagy, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activation were evaluated. Intracellular distribution of the SiNPs was evaluated with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM revealed that the SiNPs were up-taken by the HCECs inside cytoplasmic vacuoles. No mitochondrial structural damage was observed. Both cellular viability and LDH level remained unchanged with up to 100 µg/mL of SiNP treatment. Autophagy showed a significant dose-dependent activation with 50, 100, and 150 nm SiNPs. However, the mTOR activation remained unchanged. Human corneal tissue culture with 100 µg/ml concentrations of SiNPs for 72 h revealed no significant endothelial toxicity. In vivo corneal safety of the SiNPs (0.05 ml intracameral injection, 200 mg/ml concentration) was also verified in rabbit models. These findings suggested that 50, 100, and 150 nm SiNPs did not induce acute significant cytotoxicity in corneal endothelial cells at concentrations up to 100 µg/mL. However, long-term toxicity of SiNPs remains unknown.

Indexed as

AutophagyCell SurvivalCorneal Endothelial Cell LossDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMiddle AgedNanoparticlesSilicon DioxideTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesL-Lactate DehydrogenaseSilicon DioxideTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29109483
PMCPMC5674045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.