Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109301›Full record

ReviewClinical science (London, England : 1979)2017

Personalized medicine-a modern approach for the diagnosis and management of hypertension.

Carmine Savoia, Massimo Volpe, Guido Grassi, Claudio Borghi, Enrico Agabiti Rosei, Rhian M Touyz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Personalized hypertension treatment recommendations by a data-driven model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Precision medicine and metabolic syndrome.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carmine SavoiaClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Cardiology Unit Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy carmine.savoia@uniroma1.it.
Massimo VolpeClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Cardiology Unit Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Guido GrassiClinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milan, IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
Claudio BorghiChair of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico Agabiti RoseiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Clinica Medica, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Rhian M TouyzInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITMultiMedica · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/13/7/30099Medical Research Council MR/N005813/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of treating hypertension is to reduce blood pressure to physiological levels and thereby prevent risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension-associated target organ damage. Despite reductions in major risk factors and the availability of a plethora of effective antihypertensive drugs, the control of blood pressure to target values is still poor due to multiple factors including apparent drug resistance and lack of adherence. An explanation for this problem is related to the current reductionist and 'trial-and-error' approach in the management of hypertension, as we may oversimplify the complex nature of the disease and not pay enough attention to the heterogeneity of the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of the disorder. Taking into account specific risk factors, genetic phenotype, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and other particular features unique to each patient, would allow a personalized approach to managing the disease. Personalized medicine therefore represents the tailoring of medical approach and treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient and is expected to become the paradigm of future healthcare. The advancement of systems biology research and the rapid development of high-throughput technologies, as well as the characterization of different -omics, have contributed to a shift in modern biological and medical research from traditional hypothesis-driven designs toward data-driven studies and have facilitated the evolution of personalized or precision medicine for chronic diseases such as hypertension.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionPrecision MedicineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureGenomicsHumansHypertensionRisk FactorsSystems BiologyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentscompliancehypertesionpersonalized medicinesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID29109301
PMCPMC5736921
OpenAlexW2765127880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.