Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109261›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Scale-dependent portfolio effects explain growth inflation and volatility reduction in landscape demography.

Cang Hui, Gordon A Fox, Jessica Gurevitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cang HuiCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3660-8160
Gordon A FoxDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-1385
Jessica GurevitchStellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Matieland 7602, South Africa; Jessica.gurevitch@stonybrook.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-4332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population demography is central to fundamental ecology and for predicting range shifts, decline of threatened species, and spread of invasive organisms. There is a mismatch between most demographic work, carried out on few populations and at local scales, and the need to predict dynamics at landscape and regional scales. Inspired by concepts from landscape ecology and Markowitz's portfolio theory, we develop a landscape portfolio platform to quantify and predict the behavior of multiple populations, scaling up the expectation and variance of the dynamics of an ensemble of populations. We illustrate this framework using a 35-y time series on gypsy moth populations. We demonstrate the demography accumulation curve in which the collective growth of the ensemble depends on the number of local populations included, highlighting a minimum but adequate number of populations for both regional-scale persistence and cross-scale inference. The attainable set of landscape portfolios further suggests tools for regional population management for both threatened and invasive species.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesModels, StatisticalAnimalsComputer SimulationEcosystemEndangered SpeciesMothsPopulation Dynamicsdemography accumulation curvegrowth inflationpopulation demographyscale dependencevolatility reduction

Identifiers

PMID29109261
PMCPMC5703273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.