Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109236›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

History-Dependent Odor Processing in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Amit Vinograd, Yoav Livneh, Adi Mizrahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dense and Persistent Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb of Awake Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Conserved neural dynamics and computations across species in olfaction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Learning-Induced Odor Modulation of Neuronal Activity in Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Olfactory Bulb DToxins · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amit VinogradDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, and.
Yoav LivnehDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, and.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-4201
Adi MizrahiDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Life Sciences, and mizrahi.adi@mail.huji.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, animals normally perceive sensory information on top of backgrounds. Thus, the neural substrate to perceive under background conditions is inherent in all sensory systems. Where and how sensory systems process backgrounds is not fully understood. In olfaction, just a few studies have addressed the issue of odor coding on top of continuous odorous backgrounds. Here, we tested how background odors are encoded by mitral cells (MCs) in the olfactory bulb (OB) of male mice. Using

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsMaleMemoryMiceMice, TransgenicOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysSmellolfactory bulbolfactory codingtwo-photon calcium imaging

Identifiers

PMID29109236
PMCPMC5719977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.