Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109165›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Validation of Putative Apicoplast-Targeting Drugs Using a Chemical Supplementation Assay in Cultured Human Malaria Parasites.

Taher Uddin, Geoffrey Ian McFadden, Christopher Dean Goodman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Apicoplast-Resident Processes: Exploiting the Chink in the Armour ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Targeting theHeliyon · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Targeting malaria parasites with novel derivatives of azithromycin.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taher UddinSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Geoffrey Ian McFadden *School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5351-1627
Christopher Dean Goodman *School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia deang@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8923-7594
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria parasites contain a relict plastid, the apicoplast, which is considered an excellent drug target due to its bacterial-like ancestry. Numerous parasiticidals have been proposed to target the apicoplast, but few have had their actual targets substantiated. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) production is the sole required function of the apicoplast in the blood stage of the parasite life cycle, and IPP supplementation rescues parasites from apicoplast-perturbing drugs. Hence, any drug that kills parasites when IPP is supplied in culture must have a nonapicoplast target. Here, we use IPP supplementation to discriminate whether 23 purported apicoplast-targeting drugs are on- or off-target. We demonstrate that a prokaryotic DNA replication inhibitor (ciprofloxacin), several prokaryotic translation inhibitors (chloramphenicol, doxycycline, tetracycline, clindamycin, azithromycin, erythromycin, and clarithromycin), a tRNA synthase inhibitor (mupirocin), and two IPP synthesis pathway inhibitors (fosmidomycin and FR900098) have apicoplast targets. Intriguingly, fosmidomycin and FR900098 leave the apicoplast intact, whereas the others eventually result in apicoplast loss. Actinonin, an inhibitor of bacterial posttranslational modification, does not produce a typical delayed-death response but is rescued with IPP, thereby confirming its apicoplast target. Parasites treated with putative apicoplast fatty acid pathway inhibitors could not be rescued, demonstrating that these drugs have their primary targets outside the apicoplast, which agrees with the dispensability of the apicoplast fatty acid synthesis pathways in the blood stage of malaria parasites. IPP supplementation provides a simple test of whether a compound has a target in the apicoplast and can be used to screen novel compounds for mode of action.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsApicoplastsAzithromycinCells, CulturedDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFatty AcidsHemeHemiterpenesHumansHydroxamic AcidsMalaria, FalciparumOrganophosphorus CompoundsPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsactinoninAntimalarialsAzithromycinFatty AcidsHemeHemiterpenesHydroxamic Acidsisopentenyl pyrophosphateOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtozoan Proteinsantimalarialsapicoplastdrug targetsIPPPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID29109165
PMCPMC5740311
OpenAlexW2767970508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.