Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29109162›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Comparative Assessment of Tedizolid Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Penetration between Diabetic Patients with Wound Infections and Healthy Volunteers via

Sean M Stainton, Marguerite L Monogue, Arlinda Baummer-Carr, Ashley K Shepard, James F Nugent, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Role of Novel Antibiotics in the Management of Diabetic Foot Infection.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Effect of the human endotoxin challenge on tedizolid tissue penetration.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Importance and Reality of TDM for Antibiotics Not Covered by Insurance in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Antibiotics in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Tedizolid: a service evaluation in a large UK teaching hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean M StaintonCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Marguerite L MonogueCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Arlinda Baummer-CarrCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Ashley K ShepardHartford Healthcare Medical Group, Podiatric Surgery, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
James F NugentHartford Healthcare Medical Group, Podiatric Surgery, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Joseph L KutiCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Hospital · USHartford Financial Services (United States)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we present pharmacokinetic and tissue penetration data for oral tedizolid in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) compared with healthy volunteers. Participants received oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg every 24 h for 3 doses to achieve steady state. A microdialysis catheter was inserted into the subcutaneous tissue near the margin of the wound for patients or into thigh tissue of volunteers. Following the third dose, 12 blood and 14 dialysate fluid samples were collected over 24 h to characterize tedizolid concentrations in plasma and interstitial extracellular fluid of soft tissue. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) tedizolid pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma for patients compared with volunteers, respectively, were as follows: maximum concentration (

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCase-Control StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusExtracellular FluidFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMicrodialysisMiddle AgedOxazolidinonesAnti-Bacterial AgentsOxazolidinonestedizolidTetrazolesdiabetesmicrodialysispharmacokineticstedizolidtissue penetration

Identifiers

PMID29109162
PMCPMC5740339
OpenAlexW2767340153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.