ArticlePlacenta2017
Chorionic vascular "fit" in the human placenta: Relationship to fetoplacental outcomes.
Article in Placenta, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical and Functional Insights Into Hyrtl's Anastomosis: Implications for Placental and Fetal Vascular Dynamics.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- PFAS alters placental arterial vasculature in term human placentae: A prospective pregnancy cohort study.Placenta · 2024Article
- A study on the correlation of placental anastomosis and superficial vascular branches of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Advances in Human Placental Biomechanics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNovel measures of the chorionic plate and vessels are used to test the hypothesis that variation in placental structure is correlated with reduced birth weight (BW) independent of placental weight (PW), suggesting functionally compromised placentas.
methods916 mothers recruited to the Pregnancy, Infection and Nutrition Study delivering singleton live born infants at >30 gestational weeks had placentas collected, digitally photographed and weighed prior to formalin fixation. The fetal-placental weight ratio (FPR) was calculated as birthweight/placental weight. Beta (beta) was calculated as ln(PW)/ln(BW). Chorionic disk perimeter was traced and chorionic surface shape (CS) area was calculated. "Fit" was defined as the ratio of the area of the vascular to the full chorionic surface area. The sites at which chorionic vessels dived beneath the chorionic surface were marked to calculate the chorionic surface vessel (CV) area. The centroids of shapes, the distance between centroids and other measures of shape irregularities were calculated. Principal components analysis (PCA) created three independent factors. Factors were used in regression analyses to explore relations to birth weight, trimmed placental weight, FPR, and beta. Specific measures of shape irregularity were also examined in regression analyses for interrelationships and to predict birth weight, placental weight, FPR, and beta.
resultsVariables related to disk size (CS area, perimeter) were correlated with BW, GA, trimmed PW and beta. "Fit" (the ratio of CV area to CS area), measures of shape irregularities, and the distance between the cord insertion and the centroids of surface and vascular areas were also correlated with one or more of the clinical outcome variables. PCA yielded three factors that had independent effects on birth weight, placental weight, the fetal-placental weight ratio, and beta (each p < 0.0001). Addition of GA did not alter the factors' associations with outcomes. Chorionic "fit" (ratio of areas), also included within the factor analysis, was a positive predictor of birth weight (p = 0.005) and FPR (p = 0.002) and a negative predictor of beta (p = 0.01). Fit was statistically significantly associated with greater distances between the umbilical cord insertion site and the CS (p < 0.001) and CV centroids (p < 0.001), and to lesser displacement between CS and CV centroids (p < 0.001).
conclusionsMeasures of CS and CV account for variation in placental efficiency defined by beta, independent of GA. Macroscopic placenta measurements can identify suboptimal placental development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.