Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29108353›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe.

Jürgen C Becker, Eva Lorenz, Selma Ugurel, Thomas K Eigentler, Felix Kiecker, Claudia Pföhler, Ivonne Kellner, Friedegund Meier, Katharina Kähler, Peter Mohr and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Functionalization of Nanomaterials for Skin Cancer Theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Jürgen C BeckerTranslational Skin Cancer Research (TSCR), German Cancer Research Center (DFKZ) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen University Hospital, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Eva LorenzIMS HEALTH GmbH and Co OHG, 60598, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Thomas K EigentlerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Felix KieckerCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Claudia PföhlerSaarland University Medical School, Department of Dermatology, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Ivonne KellnerHelios-Klinik, Department of Dermatology, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Friedegund MeierSkin Cancer Center, University Cancer Centre, and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Katharina KählerUniversitätsklinikum, Department of Dermatology, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Peter MohrElbe-Kliniken, Skin Cancer Center, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany.
Carola BerkingUniversity Hospital Munich (LMU), Department of Dermatology and Allergy, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Gabriele HaasDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Christoph HelwigMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Dina OksenMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Lisa MahnkeEMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA, 01821, USA.
Murtuza BharmalMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEMerck (Germany) · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEElbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHelios Klinikum Erfurt · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USSaarland University · DEUniversitäts Hautklinik Kiel · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer; few treatments exist for patients with advanced disease. Once tumors metastasize to distant sites, patients generally receive chemotherapy, but response duration and progression-free survival (PFS) are typically short. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. Here, we studied outcomes in patients who received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients in an MCC-specific registry diagnosed with stage IV MCC between November 1, 2004, and September 15, 2015, and treated with second-line or later chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. Patient records, including baseline characteristics, immunocompetent status, and responses to prior chemotherapy, were evaluated. Patients meeting eligibility criteria were followed through December 31, 2015.

resultsOf 29 patients with metastatic MCC and immunocompetent status who had received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy, 3 achieved a partial response, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 10.3% (95% CI, 2.2-27.4). In the overall population including patients with immunocompetent and immunocompromised status (

conclusionsThe low response rates and limited durability confirm previous reports of the ineffectiveness of second-line or later chemotherapy in patients with metastatic MCC and provide a benchmark for assessing clinical benefit of new treatments.

Indexed as

chemotherapyMerkel cell carcinomaobservational studyretrospective studyskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID29108353
PMCPMC5668086
OpenAlexW2735267409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.