ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2018
Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed Core Binding Factor-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Midostaurin plus daunorubicin or idarubicin for young and older adults with FLT3-mutated AML: a phase 3b trial.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- [Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-cytarabine-homoharringtonine-based cytoreductive therapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1::RUNX1T1: a retrospective study].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Core-Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A COMMAND Registry Study.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Prognosis of Secondary Genetic Aberrations Among Patients With Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Mitelman Database Analysis.World journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2023Review
- Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Article
- Core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia-2021 treatment algorithm.Blood cancer journal · 2021Review
- Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21).Blood advances · 2021Article
- Emerging therapies for inv(16) AML.Blood · 2021Review
- Harnessing the synergistic potential of biologically targeted therapies in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- [Impact of KIT D816 mutation on salvage therapy in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) translocation].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the factors associated with outcomes in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) in first relapse. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with CBF-AML in first relapse who presented to our institution from 1990-2014. Clinical and demographic parameters were included in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to predict overall survival.
resultsAmong the 92 relapsed patients, 60 (65%) patients had inv (16) and 32 (35%) had t (8;21). The median survival for patients with inv(16) cytogenetic group was 15.6 months (range 10.32 to 20.88 months) while for the t(8;21) group was 9 months (range 3.68 to 14.32) (P = .004). Univariate Cox model analysis showed that increased age, high white blood cell count, t (8;21) cytogenetic group, and high bone marrow blast percentage were associated with poor overall outcome, while stem cell transplant intervention was associated with better survival. Additional cytogenetic aberrations at relapse were not associated with survival outcomes (P = .4). Multivariate Cox model analysis showed that t(8;21) cytogenetic group has more hazard of death after adjusting, age, marrow blast percentage, blood cell count, and stem cell transplant(hazard ratio 1.802; P = .02).
conclusionAmong patients with relapsed CBF-AML, median survival was less than a year and half and the outcome was worse in patients with t (8;21). Despite the relatively better outcomes, dedicated clinical trials are needed to improve the outcome in all patients with relapsed CBF-AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.