Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29107583›Full record

ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2018

Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed Core Binding Factor-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Maliha Khan, Jorge Cortes, Wei Qiao, Mohanad A Alzubaidi, Sherry A Pierce, Farhad Ravandi, Hagop M Kantarjian, Gautam Borthakur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maliha KhanDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jorge CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Wei QiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mohanad A AlzubaidiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sherry A PierceDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: gborthak@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the factors associated with outcomes in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) in first relapse. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with CBF-AML in first relapse who presented to our institution from 1990-2014. Clinical and demographic parameters were included in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to predict overall survival.

resultsAmong the 92 relapsed patients, 60 (65%) patients had inv (16) and 32 (35%) had t (8;21). The median survival for patients with inv(16) cytogenetic group was 15.6 months (range 10.32 to 20.88 months) while for the t(8;21) group was 9 months (range 3.68 to 14.32) (P = .004). Univariate Cox model analysis showed that increased age, high white blood cell count, t (8;21) cytogenetic group, and high bone marrow blast percentage were associated with poor overall outcome, while stem cell transplant intervention was associated with better survival. Additional cytogenetic aberrations at relapse were not associated with survival outcomes (P = .4). Multivariate Cox model analysis showed that t(8;21) cytogenetic group has more hazard of death after adjusting, age, marrow blast percentage, blood cell count, and stem cell transplant(hazard ratio 1.802; P = .02).

conclusionAmong patients with relapsed CBF-AML, median survival was less than a year and half and the outcome was worse in patients with t (8;21). Despite the relatively better outcomes, dedicated clinical trials are needed to improve the outcome in all patients with relapsed CBF-AML.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCytogeneticinv(16)RemissionSurvival measurest(8;21)

Identifiers

PMID29107583
PMCPMC5861376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.