Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29107504›Full record

ReviewCell metabolism2018

Overlapping Brain Circuits for Homeostatic and Hedonic Feeding.

Mark A Rossi, Garret D Stuber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 400 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural circuits regulating activity-based anorexia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Top-down regulation of ingestive behavior fragmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A RossiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Garret D StuberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: gstuber@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Neural circuit elements that orchestrate cue-reward associationsR37DA032750 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Garret D Stuber · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Lateral Hypothalamic Circuits for Feeding and ReinforcementR01DA038168 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STUBER, GARRET D · 2014 to 2025
$4.0M
Midbrain Neural Circuit Elements That Underlie Cue-Reward AssociationsR01DA032750 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STUBER, GARRET D · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Function and activity dynamics of lateral hypothalamic glutamatergic neurons in obesityF32DK112564 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROSSI, MARK ALLEN · 2016 to 2018
$167k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032750NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038168NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA032750NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK112564NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central regulation of food intake is a key mechanism contributing to energy homeostasis. Many neural circuits that are thought to orchestrate feeding behavior overlap with the brain's reward circuitry both anatomically and functionally. Manipulation of numerous neural pathways can simultaneously influence food intake and reward. Two key systems underlying these processes-those controlling homeostatic and hedonic feeding-are often treated as independent. Homeostatic feeding is necessary for basic metabolic processes and survival, while hedonic feeding is driven by sensory perception or pleasure. Despite this distinction, their functional and anatomical overlap implies considerable interaction that is often overlooked. Here, we argue that the neurocircuits controlling homeostatic feeding and hedonic feeding are not completely dissociable given the current data and urge researchers to assess behaviors extending beyond food intake in investigations of the neural control of feeding.

Indexed as

HomeostasisAnimalsBrainFeeding BehaviorHumansNerve NetNeuronsRewarddopaminehypothalamusobesityreward

Identifiers

PMID29107504
PMCPMC5762260
OpenAlexW2765429334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.