Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29106691›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2018

Developmental Effects of Cannabidiol and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Zebrafish.

Dennis R Carty, Cammi Thornton, James H Gledhill, Kristine L Willett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early Life Exposure to ΔCannabis and cannabinoid research · 2025
    Article
  2. Exploring Cannabinoid Effects Using Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Zebrafish as an Animal Model in Cannabinoid Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. In Vivo Evaluation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dennis R CartyDivision of Environmental Toxicology, Department of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677.
Cammi ThorntonDivision of Environmental Toxicology, Department of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677.
James H GledhillDivision of Environmental Toxicology, Department of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677.
Kristine L WillettDivision of Environmental Toxicology, Department of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677.
University of Mississippi · US

Funding

Center of Research Excellence in Natural Products Neuroscience (CORE-NPN)P20GM104932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI MAJUMDAR, SOUMYAJIT · 2012 to 2016
$10.0M
Developmental Toxicity of Cannabidiol and Δ9-TetrahydrocannabinolR21DA044473 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI WILLETT, KRISTINE L · 2017 to 2018
$384k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044473NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) has gained much attention in the past several years for its therapeutic potential in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, such as Dravet syndrome. Although CBD has shown anecdotal efficacy in reducing seizure frequency, little is known regarding the potential adverse side effects of CBD on physiology, development, organogenesis, or behavior. The goal of this project was to compare the relative morphological, behavioral, and gene expression phenotypes resulting after a developmental exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or CBD. Zebrafish were exposed from blastula through larval stage (96 h postfertilization [hpf]) to 0.3, 0.6, 1.25, 2.5, 5 mg/l (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 µM) THC or 0.07, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.25 mg/l CBD (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 µM). Despite the similarity in THC and CBD dysmorphologies, ie, edemas, curved axis, eye/snout/jaw/trunk/fin deformities, swim bladder distention, and behavioral abnormalities, the LC50 for CBD (0.53 mg/l) was nearly 7 times lower than THC (3.65 mg/l). At 96 hpf, c-fos, dazl, and vasa were differentially expressed following THC exposure, but only c-fos expression was significantly increased by CBD. Cannabidiol was more bioconcentrated compared with THC despite higher THC water concentrations. This work supports the potential for persistent developmental impacts of cannabinoid exposure, but more studies are needed to assess latent effects and their molecular mechanisms of toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCannabidiolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianLethal Dose 50TranscriptomeZebrafishCannabidiolDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID29106691
PMCPMC6257009
OpenAlexW2766737869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.