Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29106380›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2017

PDT dose dosimetry for Photofrin-mediated pleural photodynamic therapy (pPDT).

Yi Hong Ong, Michele M Kim, Jarod C Finlay, Andreea Dimofte, Sunil Singhal, Eli Glatstein, Keith A Cengel, Timothy C Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Light Fluence Rate and Tissue Oxygenation (SPhotochemistry and photobiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Monte Carlo investigation of the effect of skin tissue optical properties on detected Cherenkov emission.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  20. Validation of tissue optical properties measurement using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS).Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi Hong OngDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Michele M KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Jarod C FinlayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Andreea DimofteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Sunil SinghalDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Eli GlatsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Keith A CengelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Timothy C ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.

Funding

TUMOR HYPOXIA, PHOTOSENSITIZER, VASCULARITY AND PDTP01CA087971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSCH, THERESA M, CENGEL, KEITH A · 2001 to 2019
$24.8M
Image-guided treatment planning for pleural Photodynamic TherapyR01CA154562 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ZHU, TIMOTHY C. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosensitizer fluorescence excited by photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment light can be used to monitor the in vivo concentration of the photosensitizer and its photobleaching. The temporal integral of the product of in vivo photosensitizer concentration and light fluence is called PDT dose, which is an important dosimetry quantity for PDT. However, the detected photosensitizer fluorescence may be distorted by variations in the absorption and scattering of both excitation and fluorescence light in tissue. Therefore, correction of the measured fluorescence for distortion due to variable optical properties is required for absolute quantification of photosensitizer concentration. In this study, we have developed a four-channel PDT dose dosimetry system to simultaneously acquire light dosimetry and photosensitizer fluorescence data. We measured PDT dose at four sites in the pleural cavity during pleural PDT. We have determined an empirical optical property correction function using Monte Carlo simulations of fluorescence for a range of physiologically relevant tissue optical properties. Parameters of the optical property correction function for Photofrin fluorescence were determined experimentally using tissue-simulating phantoms. In vivo measurements of photosensitizer fluorescence showed negligible photobleaching of Photofrin during the PDT treatment, but large intra- and inter-patient heterogeneities of in vivo Photofrin concentration are observed. PDT doses delivered to 22 sites in the pleural cavity of 8 patients were different by 2.9 times intra-patient and 8.3 times inter-patient.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingPhotochemotherapyClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDihematoporphyrin EtherFluorescenceHumansMesotheliomaMonte Carlo MethodPhotosensitizing AgentsPleural NeoplasmsRadiometryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpectrometry, FluorescenceDihematoporphyrin EtherPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID29106380
PMCPMC5952607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.