Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29106358›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2017

Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening: A national survey of Canadian primary care physicians' opinions and practices.

Mitchell Geoffrey Goldenberg, Sean C Skeldon, Madhur Nayan, Yegappan Suppiah, Linda Chow, Elise Fryml, David Greenberg, Rajiv K Singal, S Larry Goldenberg

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell Geoffrey GoldenbergDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sean C SkeldonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Madhur NayanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yegappan SuppiahDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Linda ChowDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elise FrymlDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David GreenbergDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rajiv K SingalDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S Larry GoldenbergDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2014, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) recommended against routine prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test. We surveyed Canadian primary care physicians (PCPs) to understand their opinions and attitudes towards prostate cancer screening in 2016.

methodsTwenty PCPs piloted the survey to assess its accessibility. We distributed a flyer to 19 633 PCPs as an insert in a large mailed package inviting them to attend a national meeting, and later promoted the survey at the meeting. Multinomial logistic regression models examined factors associated with agreement of key guideline statements and the overall benefit of PSA screening.

resultsA total of 1254 PCPs responded (rate of 6.4%); 54.7% of physicians aware of the CTFPHC recommendations report screening less often as a result. Overall, 55.6% of PCPs feel that the risks of PSA screening outweigh the benefits. On multivariable analysis, physicians who did not read the guidelines, did not have an academic appointment, or were in practice for over 20 years were significantly more likely to disagree with the statement that men 55-69 years old should not be screened for prostate cancer with PSA.

conclusionsOur national survey found that the prostate cancer screening practices of Canadian PCPs varies widely across physician demographic groups, with almost equal numbers for or against. This has significant ethical, medical, and legal implications. The poor response rate to highly incentivized survey request may suggest a reluctance or general apathy towards this subject because of the Task Force recommendations. Future efforts should provide physicians with objective guidance around PSA screening, incorporating input from all stakeholders, including PCPs, urologists, and patients.

Identifiers

PMID29106358
PMCPMC5962947
OpenAlexW2765874723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.