Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29105663›Full record

Observational studyNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Exacerbated Craving in the Presence of Stress and Drug Cues in Drug-Dependent Patients.

Kenzie L Preston, William J Kowalczyk, Karran A Phillips, Michelle L Jobes, Massoud Vahabzadeh, Jia-Ling Lin, Mustapha Mezghanni, David H Epstein

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluating a longitudinal mediation model of perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and substance use treatment outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kenzie L PrestonClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William J KowalczykClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karran A PhillipsClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michelle L JobesClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Massoud VahabzadehBiomedical Informatics Section, Administrative Management Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jia-Ling LinBiomedical Informatics Section, Administrative Management Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mustapha MezghanniBiomedical Informatics Section, Administrative Management Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David H EpsteinClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Scientific Computing & Informatics Core (SCIC)ZIHDA000534 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI ERIKSON, RYEN · 2009 to 2025
$65.3M
Real-Time Assessment of Drug Use, Along with Mental States and EnvironmentsZIADA000499 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI EPSTEIN, DAVID · 2009 to 2025
$19.9M
New approaches to addiction treatmentZIADA000624 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI EPSTEIN, DAVID · 2018 to 2025
$9.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addiction, risk factors for craving and use include stress and drug-related cues. Stress and cues have additive or more-than-additive effects on drug seeking in laboratory animals, but, surprisingly, seem to compete with one another (ie, exert less-than-additive effects) in human laboratory studies of craving. We sought heretofore elusive evidence that human drug users could show additive (or more-than-additive) effects of stress and cues on craving, using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Outpatients (N=182) maintained on daily buprenorphine or methadone provided self-reports of stress, craving, mood, and behavior on electronic diaries for up to 16 weeks. In three randomly prompted entries (RPs) per day, participants reported the severity of stress and craving and whether they had seen or been offered opioids, cocaine, cannabis, methamphetamine, alcohol, or tobacco. In random-effects models controlling for between-person differences, we tested effects of momentary drug-cue exposure and stress (and their interaction) on momentary ratings of cocaine and heroin craving. For cocaine craving, the Stress × Cue interaction term had a positive mean effect across participants (M=0.019; CL95 0.001-0.036), denoting a more-than-additive effect. For heroin, the mean was not significantly greater than 0, but the confidence interval was predominantly positive (M=0.019; CL95 -0.007-0.044), suggesting at least an additive effect. Heterogeneity was substantial; qualitatively, the Stress × Cue effect appeared additive for most participants, more than additive for a sizeable minority, and competitive in very few. In the field, unlike in human laboratory studies to date, craving for cocaine and heroin is greater with the combination of drug cues and stress than with either alone. For a substantial minority of users, the combined effect may be more than additive.

Indexed as

CuesAdultCravingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersRandom AllocationSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29105663
PMCPMC5809798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.