Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29105565›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

Validation of 2 point-of-care meters for measuring triglycerides in chickens using whole blood and plasma.

Katherine L Irvine, Christoph Mans, Kristen R Friedrichs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine L IrvineDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences (Irvine, Friedrichs), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Christoph MansDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences (Irvine, Friedrichs), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Kristen R FriedrichsDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences (Irvine, Friedrichs), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of the avian reproductive tract are common, yet monitoring their resolution presents a diagnostic dilemma. Reproductive hormones such as luteinizing hormone or estrogen are the best reflection of reproductive status, but the required sample volumes and lack of reference intervals limit their clinical utility. An alternative analyte is blood triglyceride, the concentration of which rises markedly during sustained estrogen release from the ovary. Portable meters for measuring human blood triglyceride concentration offer the advantage of using minimal sample volumes, but these have not been validated for use in birds. We assessed the precision and accuracy of 2 portable meters for measuring blood triglyceride concentration in pooled whole blood and plasma from chickens ( n = 42), and performed method comparison using a reference analyzer and determined total error. Within-run repeatability was fair-to-excellent using whole blood and plasma (range: 2.5-11.5%), and between-run repeatability using plasma was similar (3.1-12.2%). The meters performed well in recovery and dilution studies in which almost all readings fell within the preset requirement of 75-125%. Correlations between each meter, using whole blood and plasma, and the reference analyzer, using plasma only, were high to very high (0.86-0.98). Bias determined by Bland-Altman analysis was similar between whole blood and plasma for each meter, yet markedly different between the meters. The calculated total observed error was consequently within our pre-set total allowable error of 25% for one meter but not the other, indicating the requirement for a meter-specific reference interval.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsBlood Chemical AnalysisChickensFemaleMalePlasmaPoint-of-Care SystemsReproducibility of ResultsTriglyceridesTriglyceridesChickensinstrumentationpoint-of-care systemstriglycerides.

Identifiers

PMID29105565
PMCPMC6505870
OpenAlexW2765466106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.