Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29105244›Full record

ReviewNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2018

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treating Chronic Pain: Reviewing Preclinical and Clinical Data on Paresthesia-Free High-Frequency Therapy.

Krishnan Chakravarthy, Hira Richter, Paul J Christo, Kayode Williams, Yun Guan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Closed-loop SCS and sensing: now and in the future.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A narrative review of autophagy in migraine.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Motor improvement and spasms recovery with high-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in a patient with spastic tetraparesis: beyond pain relief.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krishnan ChakravarthyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Hira RichterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul J ChristoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kayode WilliamsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yun GuanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Mrgs as New Target for the Treatment of Neuropathic PainR01NS070814 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUAN, YUN · 2011 to 2020
$3.2M
CRCNS: Towards Pain Control: Synergizing Computational and Biological ApproachesR01AT009401 · NCCIH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SARMA, SRIDEVI V. · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Developing Novel Direct Current Stimulation Technology for Safe Precision Pain TreatmentR21NS099879 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUAN, YUN · 2016 to 2017
$449k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009401NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070814NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) requires that paresthesia overlaps chronic painful areas. However, the new paradigm high-frequency SCS (HF-SCS) does not rely on paresthesia. STUDY

designA review of preclinical and clinical studies regarding the use of paresthesia-free HF-SCS for various chronic pain states.

methodsWe reviewed available literatures on HF-SCS, including Nevro's paresthesia-free ultra high-frequency 10 kHz therapy (HF10-SCS). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, and SCOPUS, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary goal is to describe the present developing conceptions of preclinical mechanisms of HF-SCS and to review clinical efficacy on paresthesia-free HF10-SCS for various chronic pain states.

resultsHF10-SCS offers a novel pain reduction tool without paresthesia for failed back surgery syndrome and chronic axial back pain. Preclinical findings indicate that potential mechanisms of action for paresthesia-free HF-SCS differ from those of traditional SCS.

conclusionsTo fully understand and utilize paresthesia-free HF-SCS, mechanistic study and translational research will be very important, with increasing collaboration between basic science and clinical communities to design better trials and optimize the therapy based on mechanistic findings from effective preclinical models and approaches. Future research in these vital areas may include preclinical and clinical components conducted in parallel to optimize the potential of this technology.

Indexed as

AnimalsChronic PainElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansPain MeasurementParesthesiaSpinal Cord StimulationChronic paindorsal hornfrequencyparesthesiaspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29105244
PMCPMC5766402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.