Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29105061›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2018

Annual Research Review: Not just a small adult brain: understanding later neurodevelopment through imaging the neonatal brain.

Dafnis Batalle, A David Edwards, Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dafnis BatalleCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-979X
A David EdwardsCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4801-7066
Jonathan O'MuircheartaighCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-6959
King's College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K006355/1Medical Research Council MR/LO11530/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a recent proliferation in neuroimaging research focusing on brain development in the prenatal, neonatal and very early childhood brain. Early brain injury and preterm birth are associated with increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, indicating the importance of this early period for later outcome. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY: Although using a wide range of different methodologies and investigating diverse samples, the common aim of many of these studies has been to both track normative development and investigate deviations in this development to predict behavioural, cognitive and neurological function in childhood. Here we review structural and functional neuroimaging studies investigating the developing brain. We focus on practical and technical complexities of studying this early age range and discuss how neuroimaging techniques have been successfully applied to investigate later neurodevelopmental outcome.

conclusionsNeuroimaging markers of later outcome still have surprisingly low predictive power and their specificity to individual neurodevelopmental disorders is still under question. However, the field is still young, and substantial challenges to both acquiring and modeling neonatal data are being met.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBrainBrain InjuriesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroimagingPatient-Specific ModelingPregnancyBiomarkersbiomarkersneurodevelopmental disordersneuroimagingperinatalPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID29105061
PMCPMC5900873
OpenAlexW2766024669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.