Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29104790›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2017

Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design.

Ali Mosayyebi, Aravinthan Vijayakumar, Qi Y Yue, Ewa Bres-Niewada, Costantino Manes, Dario Carugo, Bhaskar K Somani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06815120 (Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06815120 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCatheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney StoneArmsExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Qualitative interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound-activated cilia for biofilm control in indwelling medical devices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Case - An invisible stent.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Organ Chips and Visualization of Biological Systems.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational simulation of the flow dynamic field in a porous ureteric stent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali MosayyebiBioengineering Science research group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Aravinthan VijayakumarBioengineering Science research group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Qi Y YueBioengineering Science research group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ewa Bres-NiewadaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Costantino ManesDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Dario CarugoBioengineering Science research group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn ideal stent would offer simple insertion and removal with no discomfort and/or migration, it would have no biofilm formation or encrustation and would also maintain the patient's quality of life. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this mini-review, we outlined the engineering developments related to stent material, design and coating.

resultsThere have been a wide variety of in-vitro, model-based, animal-based and clinical studies using a range of commercial and non-commercial stents. Ureteric stents have evolved since their first usage with a wider range of stent design, material and coating available for laboratory and clinical use.

conclusionsWhile engineering innovations have led to the evolution of stents, more work needs to be done to address the issues relating to stent encrustation and biofilm formation.

Indexed as

coatingdesignengineeringmaterialstentureter

Identifiers

PMID29104790
PMCPMC5656375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.