Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29104776›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Death Receptors: New Opportunities in Cancer Therapy.

V M Ukrainskaya, A V Stepanov, I S Glagoleva, V D Knorre, A A Jr Belogurov, A G Gabibov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PeerJ · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V M UkrainskayaM.M. Shemyakin and Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16 /10, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
A V StepanovM.M. Shemyakin and Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16 /10, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
I S GlagolevaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kremlyovskaya Str., 18, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.
V D KnorreM.M. Shemyakin and Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16 /10, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
A A Jr BelogurovM.M. Shemyakin and Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16 /10, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
A G GabibovM.M. Shemyakin and Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16 /10, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article offers a detailed review of the current approaches to anticancer therapy that target the death receptors of malignant cells. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the structure and function of death receptors and their ligands, describe the current and latest trends in the development of death receptor agonists, and perform their comparative analysis. In addition, we discuss the DR4 and DR5 agonistic antibodies that are being evaluated at various stages of clinical trials. Finally, we conclude by stating that death receptor agonists may be improved through increasing their stability, solubility, and elimination half-life, as well as by overcoming the resistance of tumor cells. What's more, effective application of these antibodies requires a more detailed study of their use in combination with other anticancer agents.

Indexed as

apoptosisdeath receptorsDR4DR5TNFtumor cells

Identifiers

PMID29104776
PMCPMC5662274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.