Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29104772›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Non-bulky Lesions in Human DNA: the Ways of Formation, Repair, and Replication.

A V Ignatov, K A Bondarenko, A V Makarova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Novel mouse line with D277N mutation in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Multifaceted Nature of DNA Polymerase θ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Chronic and Acute Toxicities of Aflatoxins: Mechanisms of Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  10. DNA-Histone Cross-Links: Formation and Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Mammalian DNA Polymerase Kappa Activity and Specificity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Isoforms of Base Excision Repair Enzymes Produced by Alternative Splicing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. DNA Damage Tolerance by Eukaryotic DNA Polymerase and Primase PrimPol.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A V IgnatovInstitute of Molecular Genetics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kurchatov sq. 2, Moscow, 123182 , Russia.
K A BondarenkoInstitute of Molecular Genetics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kurchatov sq. 2, Moscow, 123182 , Russia.
A V MakarovaInstitute of Molecular Genetics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kurchatov sq. 2, Moscow, 123182 , Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage is a major cause of replication interruption, mutations, and cell death. DNA damage is removed by several types of repair processes. The involvement of specialized DNA polymerases in replication provides an important mechanism that helps tolerate persistent DNA damage. Specialized DNA polymerases incorporate nucleotides opposite lesions with high efficiency but demonstrate low accuracy of DNA synthesis. In this review, we summarize the types and mechanisms of formation and repair of non-bulky DNA lesions, and we provide an overview of the role of specialized DNA polymerases in translesion DNA synthesis.

Indexed as

DNA damageDNA repairDNA translesion synthesis

Identifiers

PMID29104772
PMCPMC5662270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.