Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29104559›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2017

Optimizing the Definitions of Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Infarction for Research and Application in Clinical Practice.

Anne L Abbott, Mauro Silvestrini, Raffi Topakian, Jonathan Golledge, Alejandro M Brunser, Gert J de Borst, Robert E Harbaugh, Fergus N Doubal, Tatjana Rundek, Ankur Thapar and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Lessons From ACST-2.Stroke · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Stroke and Athletes: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. White matter hyperintensity determines ischemic stroke severity in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Anne L AbbottDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mauro SilvestriniNeurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Raffi TopakianDepartment of Neurology, Academic Teaching Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Jonathan GolledgeQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Alejandro M BrunserCerebrovascular Program, Neurology Service, Department of Medicine, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana - Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Gert J de BorstDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Robert E HarbaughDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State University, State College, PA, United States.
Fergus N DoubalCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tatjana RundekDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Ankur ThaparImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Alun H DaviesAcademic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony KamDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Joanna M WardlawDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alfred Health · AUCharing Cross Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBJames Cook University · AUKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATMarche Polytechnic University · ITMonash University · AUPennsylvania State University · USUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUntil now, stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) have been clinically based terms which describe the presence and duration of characteristic neurological deficits attributable to intrinsic disorders of particular arteries supplying the brain, retina, or (sometimes) the spinal cord. Further, infarction has been pathologically defined as death of neural tissue due to reduced blood supply. Recently, it has been proposed we shift to definitions of stroke and TIA determined by neuroimaging results alone and that neuroimaging findings be equated with infarction.

methodsWe examined the scientific validity and clinical implications of these proposals using the existing published literature and our own experience in research and clinical practice.

resultsWe found that the proposals to change to imaging-dominant definitions, as published, are ambiguous and inconsistent. Therefore, they cannot provide the standardization required in research or its application in clinical practice. Further, we found that the proposals are scientifically incorrect because neuroimaging findings do not always correlate with the clinical status or the presence of infarction. In addition, we found that attempts to use the proposals are disrupting research, are otherwise clinically unhelpful and do not solve the problems they were proposed to solve.

conclusionWe advise that the proposals must not be accepted. In particular, we explain why the clinical focus of the definitions of stroke and TIA should be retained with continued sub-classification of these syndromes depending neuroimaging results (with or without other information) and that infarction should remain a pathological term. We outline ways the established clinically based definitions of stroke and TIA, and use of them, may be improved to encourage better patient outcomes in the modern era.

Indexed as

asymptomatic carotid stenosisinfarctionpublic health practicestroketransient ischaemic attack

Identifiers

PMID29104559
PMCPMC5654955
OpenAlexW2767057949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.