Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29104297›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2016

Using insights from animal behaviour and behavioural ecology to inform marine conservation initiatives.

Rohan M Brooker, William E Feeney, James R White, Rachel P Manassa, Jacob L Johansen, Danielle L Dixson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of animal personality in conservation science.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Connecting animal and human cognition to conservation.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rohan M BrookerSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, U.S.A.
William E FeeneySchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, U.S.A.
James R WhiteCollege of Tropical and Marine Science, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Rachel P ManassaWater Studies Centre, School of Chemistry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jacob L JohansenMarine Science Institute, University of Texas, Port Aransas, TX, U.S.A.
Danielle L DixsonSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, U.S.A.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

The USP Center for Drug Discovery and ConservationU19TW007401 · FIC · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAY, MARK E · 2014 to 2018
$5.3M
FIC NIH HHS U19 TW007401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impacts of human activities on the natural world are becoming increasingly apparent, with rapid development and exploitation occurring at the expense of habitat quality and biodiversity. Declines are especially concerning in the oceans, which hold intrinsic value due to their biological uniqueness as well as their substantial sociological and economic importance. Here, we review the literature and investigate whether incorporation of knowledge from the fields of animal behaviour and behavioural ecology may improve the effectiveness of conservation initiatives in marine systems. In particular, we consider (1) how knowledge of larval behaviour and ecology may be used to inform the design of marine protected areas, (2) how protecting species that hold specific ecological niches may be of particular importance for maximizing the preservation of biodiversity, (3) how current harvesting techniques may be inadvertently skewing the behavioural phenotypes of stock populations and whether changes to current practices may lessen this skew and reinforce population persistence, and (4) how understanding the behavioural and physiological responses of species to a changing environment may provide essential insights into areas of particular vulnerability for prioritized conservation attention. The complex nature of conservation programmes inherently results in interdisciplinary responses, and the incorporation of knowledge from the fields of animal behaviour and behavioural ecology may increase our ability to stem the loss of biodiversity in marine environments.

Indexed as

behaviorconservationcoral reeffisherieslarval dispersalmarine protected areapersonalityphysiological tolerancespecialization

Identifiers

PMID29104297
PMCPMC5665575
OpenAlexW2343032138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.