ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018
Diagnostic dilemmas in chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chlamydia trachomatis proctitis mimicking an inflammatory bowel disease and hiding human immunodeficiency virus infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: Real-Time Histology at the Fingertips: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications of Endomicroscopy in Barrett Esophagus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Colorectal Lesions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Geographic distribution of inflammatory bowel disease in the UK: A spatially explicit survey.PloS one · 2025Article
- Histopathology of Non-IBD Colitis. A practical approach from the Italian Group for the study of the gastrointestinal tract (GIPAD).Pathologica · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathological assessment of biopsy and resection specimens of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (CIBD), or possible CIBD, forms a significant component of the routine workload in most tissue pathology laboratories. In this review, we have chosen selected areas of particular diagnostic difficulty in CIBD pathology, providing key advice for pathology reporting. Those mimics of CIBD which have the greatest potential for misdiagnosis are discussed, particularly the wide range of infectious colitides which represent possible diagnostic pitfalls. The most important distinguishing features between the two main forms of CIBD, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are addressed, first in relation to resection specimens, and then with emphasis on features which may also be diagnostically useful in endoscopic biopsy material. The importance of assessment of the index endoscopic specimen is stressed, before treatment has been instigated, along with careful correlation with clinical and endoscopic features. Problems in the assessment of post-surgical CIBD specimens are described and then the role of upper gastrointestinal pathology specimens in diagnosing both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, with increased recognition of upper gastrointestinal tract involvement in the latter condition. Finally, with recent developments in endoscopic surveillance techniques and local excision options, modern approaches to reporting and managing neoplasia complicating CIBD are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.