Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29103165›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2018

The urethral closure mechanism is deteriorated after anterior colporrhaphy.

Yasmine Khayyami, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Urethral sphincter volume and urodynamic diagnosis.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prolapse reduction deteriorates the urethral closure mechanism.International urogynecology journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasmine KhayyamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. yasmine.khayyami@regionh.dk.
Gunnar LoseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Niels KlarskovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) has proven highly reproducible in women with pelvic organ prolapse. We hypothesized that urethral parameters would decrease after anterior colporrhaphy.

methodsA prospective, observational study where women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse ≥stage II were assessed before and after anterior colporrhaphy. Assessments consisted of prolapse staging according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, UPR measurements at rest, during squeezing and straining (at a standardized abdominal pressure of 50 cmH

resultsTwenty-eight women who underwent anterior colporrhaphy completed the study. P

conclusionsThe urethral closure mechanism deteriorates after anterior colporrhaphy. Using UPR, we can calculate a woman's risk of SUI after anterior colporrhaphy.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative PeriodPregnancyPreoperative PeriodPressureProspective StudiesUrethraUrinary BladderUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamicsUterine ProlapseAnterior colporrhaphyPelvic organ prolapseStress urinary incontinenceUrethral pressure reflectometryUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID29103165
OpenAlexW2765787168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.