Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29103131›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018

Effects of Hydrophobic Amino Acid Substitutions on Antimicrobial Peptide Behavior.

Kimberly D Saint Jean, Karlee D Henderson, Christina L Chrom, Louisa E Abiuso, Lindsay M Renn, Gregory A Caputo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Fava Bean (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antimicrobial Peptide Synergies for Fighting Infectious Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly D Saint JeanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Karlee D HendersonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Christina L ChromDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Louisa E AbiusoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Lindsay M RennDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Gregory A CaputoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA. caputo@rowan.edu.
Rowan University · US

Funding

Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health 1R15GM094330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are naturally occurring components of the immune system that act against bacteria in a variety of organisms throughout the evolutionary hierarchy. There have been many studies focused on the activity of AMPs using biophysical and microbiological techniques; however, a clear and predictive mechanism toward determining if a peptide will exhibit antimicrobial activity is still elusive, in addition to the fact that the mechanism of action of AMPs has been shown to vary between peptides, targets, and experimental conditions. Nonetheless, the majority of AMPs contain hydrophobic amino acids to facilitate partitioning into bacterial membranes and a net cationic charge to promote selective binding to the anionic surfaces of bacteria over the zwitterionic host cell surfaces. This study explores the role of hydrophobic amino acids using the peptide C18G as a model system. These changes were evaluated for the effects on antimicrobial activity, peptide-lipid interactions using Trp fluorescence spectroscopy, peptide secondary structure formation, and bacterial membrane permeabilization. The results show that while secondary structure formation was not significantly impacted by the substitutions, antibacterial activity and binding to model lipid membranes were well correlated. The variants containing Leu or Phe as the sole hydrophobic groups bound bilayers with highest affinity and were most effective at inhibiting bacterial growth. Peptides with Ile exhibited intermediate behavior while those with Val or α-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) showed poor binding and activity. The Leu, Phe, and Ile peptides demonstrated a clear preference for anionic bilayers, exhibiting significant emission spectrum shifts upon binding. Similarly, the Leu, Phe, and Ile peptides demonstrated greater ability to disrupt lipid vesicles and bacterial membranes. In total, the data indicate that hydrophobic moieties in the AMP sequence play a significant role in the binding and ability of the peptide to exhibit antibacterial activity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProtein Structure, SecondaryPseudomonas aeruginosaSalmonella typhiStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAntimicrobial peptidesC18GFluorescenceLipid binding

Identifiers

PMID29103131
OpenAlexW2765719309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.