Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy.
Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02270554 (A Prospective, Multi-center Investigation of Impact of the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload With Tri-Staple Technology During Distal Pancreatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center Investigation of Impact of the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload With Tri-Staple Technology During Distal Pancreatectomy
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Suture versus stapler in distal pancreatectomy and its impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Application of reinforced U-shaped suture technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 165 consecutive cases.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- From passive sealing to active microenvironment remodeling: design strategies, biological effects, and translational challenges of multifunctional hydrogels for postoperative pancreatic fistula prevention.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Retroperitonealization of the pancreatic stump in distal pancreatectomy: a novel technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Pancreas Ligation Device for Distal Pancreatectomy: An Ex Vivo Follow-Up Porcine Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Efficacy of the slow firing method using a reinforced triple-row stapler for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.Surgery today · 2022Article
- Self-assembling peptide hydrogel SPG-178 as a pancreatic fistula-preventing agent.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Innovative Pancreas Ligation Band for Distal Pancreatectomy: A Pilot In Vivo Porcine Study.Cureus · 2021Article
- Conversion to open laparotomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: lessons from a single-center experience in 70 consecutive patients.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Prevention and treatment of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic body and tail resection: current status and future directions.Frontiers of medicine · 2020Review
- Modified Reinforced Staple Closure Technique Decreases Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: a single-center comparative study.Surgery today · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers during distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain controversial because of the small sample size. This multicenter single-arm prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers with bioabsorbable material during DP.
methodsBetween October 2014 and August 2015, 121 patients scheduled for DP were enrolled in this study at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Protocol treatment was defined as "distal pancreatectomy using reinforced staplers."
resultsPer-protocol analysis of 105 patients was performed; 16 of the patients were excluded based on discontinuation of protocol treatment criteria. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 13 (12.4%) of 105 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 29.5% (31 of 105 patients) and severe complication (Clavien classification IIIa or more) was 10.5% (11/105). Mortality rate was 0%, although reoperations were performed on two patients (1.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after DP using reinforced stapler closure was operative time more than 240 min (P = 0.047, odds ratio 5.79), registration numbers less than 10 (P = 0.046, odds ratio 13.01), and staple line hemorrhage (P = 0.003, odds ratio 16.34).
conclusionThis study confirms the safety of reinforced staplers for pancreatic stump closure during DP. However, the efficacy of reinforced staplers for decreasing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula could not be drawn from this study.
trial registrationThis prospective study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02270554) and UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000015384).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.